?


Tuesday, March 25, 2014

UK Cash-for-Bitcoin Service ZipZap Suspends BTC Transactions


Global cash payment network ZipZap has temporarily halted digital currency transactions, after partner and non-bitcoin payment processor PayPoint said it needed more clarification on surrounding regulations.
ZipZap CEO Alan Safahi told CoinDesk the company had not ended its relationship with PayPoint, adding that it was still working with them for non-digital currency clients, and to add more payment locations. He said such issues were a fact of life for bitcoin businesses who needed to operate within the traditional fiat world. He added:
“They only halted digital currency processing until they have better legal clarification from government which we hope to have within weeks. Meanwhile, we are pursuing other options as well.”

Cash for bitcoins

ZipZap had allowed customers to buy bitcoins with cash by first registering at its site and verifying ID, printing out a barcode on a payment slip and then taking it to a cashier at a physical location to hand over the money.
The service operated in five countries and customers could also login via existing accounts with Bittylicious, BuyBitcoin.sg and BIPS Market, using exchanges ANXBTC and ANXPRO. ZipZap had plans to also include Kraken, CoinMKT and BTCX.se.
There were 28,000 physical stores for customers to pay – all of them PayPoint clients.

Processor stopped deposits

PayPoint had reportedly halted deposits to ZipZap until the UK government and the financial conduct authority provide legal clarity on digital currencies.
Though the process of printing slips and visiting a store might seem a cumbersome way to acquire such currency, it remained simpler and much less risky then dealing with online bitcoin exchanges.
Identity and address verification requirements for exchanges have increased markedly in the past year and even seasoned bitcoin users have become reluctant to trust them with large amounts of money or customers’ personal banking details.
ZipZap allowed customers to transact within their own country, as long as it was one of the five, and with registered businesses.

Banks OK, others still wary

The company had apparently had no problems with its partners in the traditional banking world, but payment processors like PayPoint and PayPal have been treading far more cautiously with digital currency related activities.
If a solution cannot be found with PayPoint, there may still be other payment processing options for ZipZap in the UK. There hasn’t been any overt pressure from the UK’s authorities for either financial institutions or the public to avoid bitcoin transactions.
Despite hints about eliminating sales tax, there is also no legislation related to bitcoin in the UK as yet, which appears to leave businesses free to try new models but which can actually stifle innovation, as entrepreneurs and investors become reluctant to enter the unknown territory.
ZipZap, still a relatively new business, has been trying to grow across the UK and other European markets. However, it may now focus on other overseas markets (like the US) after finding Europe’s environment too challenging.
The company’s site lists its headquarters in San Francisco, and it also has operations in India and Argentina.

source : http://www.coindesk.com/uk-cash-bitcoin-service-zipzap-suspends-btc-transactions/
Read more ...

European Central Bank: Bitcoin Shouldn’t be Ignored or Dismissed

Share13
The European Central Bank (ECB) has reiterated its position on digital currencies.
In a speech delivered at the at the ECB/Banca d’Italia Workshop on Interchange Fees, Yves Mersch, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, said digital currencies are still too small to have an impact on retail payments and central banks.
Mersch reiterated what the ECB said two years ago in its Virtual Currency Schemes report, published in October 2012.
In the meantime digital currencies have gained quite a following, although they are still not even close to what could be described as ‘mainstream’. In any case they are gaining popularity and as a result regulators around the world are starting to take notice.
Last December the European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a warning on potential risks related to virtual currencies, focusing on fraud and theft.
For its part, the ECB has remained silent on the matter since its 2012 report.

Phenomenon that shouldn’t be ignored

However, this time around Mersch stressed that digital currencies should not be ignored despite their relatively small impact on the economy. Keep in mind that Mersch was talking about retail payments and interchange fees, hence the limited focus on other cryptocurrency-related issues.
“Many media commentators have been wondering what impact these currencies will have on retail payments and even on central banks. I agree that virtual currency schemes are an interesting phenomenon and should not be ignored or dismissed,” he said.
“The ECB was one of the first public authorities to see their potential and their risks and published a detailed analysis in 2012. Despite the overall rise in the value of bitcoin since the publication of the report and the media attention it is getting, our conclusions still seem to be valid, namely, that such currencies are not (at least yet) economically important.”
He went on to conclude that cryptocurrencies do not pose a serious risk to price stability or financial stability in Europe, but they do pose a risk for users, which is what European central banks and the EBA have been saying for months.

Interestingly, Mersch made a clear distinction between speculative investments in bitcoin and the use of bitcoin for payments.

“However, this user risk is more related to speculative investments and consumer protection, and not necessarily to payments. Nevertheless, we are closely following developments and keeping in touch with other authorities,” he said.

A risk for retail?

Mersch said novel and unconventional challenges are facing regulators, but he did not offer any thoughts on digital currency regulation. The fact that he clearly singled out payments as a safer niche for bitcoin is encouraging, especially given the tone of his address and the focus on retail.

Consumer protection remains an issue in many situations, but in theory it could be addressed by bitcoin payment processors and merchants to some extent, although many argue that nothing short of real regulation will solve the problem.
Protection offers and buyer recourse are important for merchants and consumers alike. Merchants aren’t exposed to financial risk if there is no protection in place, but they do stand to lose credibility or risk their reputation if something goes wrong.

At the same time, consumers cannot be expected to pay for big-ticket items using a payment method that effectively strips them of consumer protection. Both parties stand to gain from lower transaction fees: merchants can increase margins, while at the same time passing part of the savings down to consumers.

Sadly though, regulatory ambiguity and uncertainty are two sizeable hurdles that won’t be overcome anytime soon.
Europe flags image via Shutterstock

source : http://www.coindesk.com/european-central-bank-bitcoin-shouldnt-ignored-dismissed/
Read more ...

First Bitcoin derivative announced by Tera Exchange

bitcoin_conference_ap.jpg

TeraExchange said on Monday it had constructed a swap based on the Bitcoin virtual currency, a step that would bring the emerging payment system under the oversight of U.S. regulators for the first time.

The contract, created on behalf of two clients, was a bilateral swap privately negotiated between them. The counterparties had not acted on the agreement, but were expected to do so soon, the company said.

The company said it had shown the contract to the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates swaps and futures. If transacted by the counterparties, the contract would need to be reported to the agency.

Regulators have stepped up their efforts to rein in Bitcoin after incidents such as the collapse of Mt. Gox, a Tokyo-based exchange that filed for bankruptcy after losing an estimated $650 million worth of customer Bitcoins.

Bart Chilton, who stepped down from his position as a member of the CFTC on Friday, told Reuters last week that companies had inquired in the past month about regulations that would govern exchanges for Bitcoin derivatives.

Ultimately, TeraExchange plans to list the Bitcoin swap on its Swap Execution Facility (SEF), a new type of regulated platform that was set up after the credit crisis to make swaps trading more transparent, less risky, and cheaper.
The company was given a license to run a SEF last year, but no trading has taken place on the platform yet.

The novelty of the Bitcoin currency has made it hard to categorize, but trading derivatives such as futures or swaps would subject companies to oversight by the CFTC.


Source : http://gadgets.ndtv.com/internet/news/first-bitcoin-derivative-announced-by-tera-exchange-499997
Read more ...

Developers Battle Over Bitcoin Block Chain

It’s surprising what worm-filled cans a new version of the bitcoin protocol will open. The core developers released a much-anticipated update to the core software – version 0.9.0 – last week. Now, a third-party developer group is already lobbying for change.

Counterparty, a financial trading platform built on the bitcoin block chain, issued an open letter to the Bitcoin protocol’s core developers last week, urging them to reconsider a key component of the protocol’s latest release. That component is called OP_RETURN, and it is a new feature designed to allow people to store extra data in the block chain.

OP_RETURN was originally meant to store 80 bytes of extra data in a bitcoin transaction, but the core developers slashed it to 40 bytes. This upset CounterParty, because as a financial trading platform that allows people to create new asset classes and financial derivatives to be traded on the bitcoin block chain, it says that it needed those 80 bytes to store its data.
“A 40 byte limit (in place of the 80 bytes originally planned) makes OP_RETURN unusable for Counterparty’s purposes,” said the letter.
The other option is to use another feature of the Bitcoin protocol, called multi-signature outputs. These involve more than one signature for a particular bitcoin transaction, and are designed for features such as escrow payments. But that second signature can be used to store data instead.
“If the data cap is left at 40 bytes, we will be forced to use such awkward constructions to accomplish our goals,” the Counterparty letter said. Instead, the organization wants the core devs to play ball, and restore the original 80-byte cap.

In a discussion on the Bitcoin Talk forum, core developer Jeff Garzik makes an argument for why they shouldn’t. He warns that when a transaction is processed on the bitcoin network, everyone processes it, which means that the data you’re storing has to be stored by everyone.
“It is called a free ride. Given that the overwhelming majority — >90% — application for the bitcoin blockchain is currency use, using full nodes as dumb data storage terminals is simply abusing an all-volunteer network resource,” he argues.
He accuses Counterparty and Mastercoin – another service that also uses the block chain for its own purposes – of having “simply flipped an ‘on’ switch and started using bitcoin P2P nodes as unwanted data stores.” And they didn’t engage the community before doing it either, he complains.

Get off of my block

Is it really the core developers’ job to make it possible for others to build extra services on top of the block chain? It had better, if it wants to stay relevant, says ‘PhantomPhreak’, a core developer for Counterparty.

PhantomPhreak argues that both parties get something from this kind of relationship. By piggybacking on the bitcoin block chain, Counterparty and other new services get pre-baked services including trusted timestamping, proof of publication,peer discovery and anti-DOS measures.
Bitcoin, in turn, gets to stay relevant, (s)he argues: “Bitcoin can be very conservative with the kinds of functionality that it directly supports, while still rapidly acquiring the new features that it needs to stay relevant and useful.”

So now, Counterparty (which hasn’t contributed to the bitcoin core’s open source effort), and the bitcoin core (which has stated that it needs people using the protocol to pitch in) are stuck with each other, and neither is happy. Phantomphreak says that “a few of the Bitcoin developers are trying to prevent us from using the protocol as it stands, with all of the flexibility that it naturally provides.”

Core developer Mike Hearn has an idea to cut through the whole tangled mess. In fact, he had it in 2012, before Counterparty or Mastercoin even existed. Instead of trying to store lots of data in a special field in the block chain, why not simply store a pointer to a third party, P2P data storage pool, he asks? This could be achieved using something called a distributed hash table (DHT).
“That way it doesn’t matter how much data you want to store, the impact to the block chain is always the same,” Hearn says. “Nobody is against that – it’s why OP_RETURN is sized to allow for hashes. DHTs come in conveniently reusable libraries so it’s hardly a big engineering challenge. Instead they turned it into some kind of stupid political fight.”
Talking of fights, more tensions emerged among the core devs last week, and they’re indirectly related to this question of who gets to use the block chain for what, and why.
0.9.0 reduced the transaction fees – the money paid to get a message processed by the network – tenfold. This is a good way to encourage microtransactions on the network by keeping the costs of a single transaction low, so that you could, say, pay pennies for downloading a single story.

Peter Todd, a contributor to the bitcoin code, told CoinDesk that he was worried that this would open the network up to spam and denial of service attacks, because people could use the cheap transaction fees to flood the network.
They turned it into some kind of stupid political fight.
Gavin Andresen, the Bitcoin Foundation’s chief scientist and lead developer of Bitcoin Core, says that there are plenty of ways to slow down bitcoin transactions with DoS attacks – but he argues that they generally don’t happen, primarily because the attackers would have little to gain. ”I have never said that bitcoin is directly suitable for transactions less than a dollar; I think the jury is still out on how low we can go,” he says.

Vitalik Buterin, developer of the soon-to-be-launched Ethereum project, argues that the concepts of transaction fees and storing messages on the block chain are connected. Transactions are badly thought out in the bitcoin protocol, he says. Some core developers have admitted this to CoinDesk, which is why they’re working to change it using ‘smart’ fees.
If transactions were better managed, then people could just pay for what they wanted to store, Buterin says. Then, there would be no ‘free rides’.
“It’s the protocol’s fault the OPRETURN battle is such an issue. In an ideal world, the concept of ‘abuse’ would not even exist; fees would be mandatory, and carefully structured to closely match the actual cost that a given transaction imposes on the network,” he says. “If you can pay the fees for what you’re doing then you should be able to do it, no questions asked.”
It doesn’t seem as though the core developers are about to change the OP_RETURN parameters to allow more data to be stored in the network. If they don’t, then Counterparty has some options.
It can hack together an inelegant use of the multi-signature protocol to store its data. It can explore Hearn’s idea of using pointers and distributed hash tables. Or it can simply jump ship and either build its own block chain, or use someone else’s service. Perhaps Ethereum’s for example.
But, PhantomPhreak isn’t ready for that. “Ethereum is not really an alternative to Bitcoin for our purposes,” PhantomPhreak told CoinDesk. It isn’t tried and tested yet, the anonymous developer contends.

For now then, at least, some forward-thinking initaitives that want to expand beyond bitcoin’s core services still feel as though they need the bitcoin protocol to do it. And it looks as though that’s going to generate tensions, workarounds and in-fighting for some time to come.
Chain link image via Shutterstock

source : http://www.coindesk.com/developers-battle-bitcoin-block-chain/
Read more ...

Friday, March 21, 2014

Bitcoin: a financial revolution the web's been waiting for?

 
Bitcoin may not be the messiah of a new currency its hardcore fans yearn for, but it may herald the deeper financial revolution the internet has been waiting for.

While computers and smartphones have brought the web to more than a third of the world’s population, online commerce still largely depends on a banking system that has changed little over recent decades, some of it relying on computer code written before the web was born.

The growing interest in bitcoin, a digital currency that requires no centralized body to handle transactions, is beginning to change all that.

“The rise of bitcoin has changed everyone’s idea of what a good payment system should be,” says Manu Sporny, CEO of web payments company Digital Bazaar, who is spearheading an effort to get the industry together to agree on standards for handling online transactions. “Bitcoin raised the bar, so everyone’s got to come in and match that in some way.”

A key moment, Sporny and others say, will be a meeting in Paris next week hosted by the World Wide Web Consortium, or W3C, one of the key bodies for setting internet standards.
Gathering for the first time to discuss web payment standards will be telecom operators such as Deutsche Telekom , Telefonica and AT&T, payment companies including SWIFT, PayPal and Gemalto, as well as the US Federal Reserve.

Bitcoin can claim some credit for this buzz of activity.

Much of the focus on bitcoin has been on its meteoric rise in value - soaring from $30 a year ago to above $1,000 late in the year - which has been only slightly dented by the collapse last month of Mt Gox, a leading bitcoin exchange, with half a billion dollars’ worth of bitcoins missing.
But bitcoin as a currency might be a distraction.

 Underpinning the digital currency is a combination of key computing principles - decentralised timestamping, public key cryptography and a proof of work system - that promise to revolutionise transactions.
Says Peter Vessenes, CEO of bitcoin start-up CoinLab and chairman of the Bitcoin Foundation, an advocacy group promoting its adoption: “Those three could be turned into money, but they could also do a lot of other things.”
 
Cheaper deals
What interests some, and worries others, among those due to attend the Paris meeting is the promise bitcoin offers in cutting the cost of moving money around.
“If they can have it cheaper, they will make it cheaper,” said Marcus Swanepoel of Switchless, a Singapore-based company offering to integrate bitcoin processes into traditional banks and telecom companies.

Bitcoin poses a challenge for those used to handling consumer transactions: PricewaterhouseCoopers estimates that credit card companies charge around 3 percent in transaction fees. PayPal’s cut can go as high as 4 percent. Those same transactions via bitcoin firms such as Coinbase and BitPay, which bypass central financial institutions, are as likely to be free.

source : http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/technology/bitcoin-a-financial-revolution-the-web-s-been-waiting-for-1.1733445
Read more ...

Mt. Gox Confirms Discovery of 200,000 BTC in ‘Old-Format’ Wallet

Embattled Japan-based bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox has released a new press release confirming that it found an old-format bitcoin wallet on 7th March containing 199,999.99 BTC ($113.9m at press time).

Mt. Gox further confirmed it reported the finding to its bankruptcy counsels as required by its civil rehabilitation proceedings.
The release states:
“A hearing took place on March 8 where a detailed explanation of the situation was made to counsels. Immediately on Monday (March 10), counsels reported the existence of the 200,000 BTC to the Court and the Supervisor.”
The exchange revealed it now has a total amount of 202,000 BTC, a figure which includes the 200,000 BTC recently found, as well as an additional 2,000 BTC ($1.1m) in funds.

Mt. Gox confirms money movement

The release, penned by CEO Mark Karpeles, indicated that the wallets were moved from online wallets to offline storage from 14th March to 15th March. Further, he confirmed that the courts were aware of this activity.
“These bitcoin movements (including the change in the manner in which these bitcoins were stored) has been reported to the Court and the Supervisor by counsels.”
The confirmation would suggest reports that Mt. Gox funds have been moving through the blockchain were valid, though the dates of the movement do not coincide.

Missing bitcoin figures revised

Mt. Gox indicated that with the finding, the amount of bitcoins it reported as lost or stolen needs to be revised, suggesting that this wallet, and the funds therein, were factored into the original estimate.
Said the statement:
“Taking into account the existence of the 200,000 BTC, the total number of bitcoins which have disappeared is therefore estimated to be approximately 650,000 BTC.”
Image credit: Old wallet via Shutterstock

source : http://www.coindesk.com/mt-gox-confirms-200000-btc-finding-revises-lost-bitcoin-figures/
Read more ...

BTC-e Enables Fund Withdrawals Using MasterCard and Visa Cards

shutterstock_182249597
Notoriously tight-lipped bitcoin exchange and CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index member BTC-e is now allowing customers to withdraw funds to Visa and MasterCard debit and credit cards, with some exceptions.

The company blog post, issued on 21st March, indicated that the new program is now available to customers in any country, using any currency. All customers will pay a 5% fee for the service.
The new functionality is noteworthy as it will allow customers to send money to debit and credit cards issued by two of the largest and most commonly used international card issuers. At present, the transfer of funds is only possible in US dollars.
Explained BTC-e:
“If your card is not in USD, the money will be converted at the rate of VISA / MasterCard or your bank’s rate (depending on the agreement with your bank).”
BTC-e estimated that customers will need to wait between two and four days to receive funds. MasterCard’s Maestro debit card, cards issued by PayPal and Visa Electron debit cards are not able to be used in conjunction with the service.
BTC-e did not respond to requests for further information.

Customer feedback

BTC-e conducted customer testing for an unidentified period before enabling the service, and posted answers to three frequently asked questions.
The exchange indicated the transactions will display as “affiliate payment” or “refund affiliate payment” on credit card statements. It added that funds can be sent to cards in any country and that on some cards such transactions would not be possible due to restrictions imposed by banks.
Added BTC-e:
“Some credit cards that do not allow [you] to have a positive balance cannot be funded. If payout to your card is not possible, then we will immediately notify you and refund the money back to your account.”

Renewed activity

The news follows what appears to be an increasingly active period of experimentation from the major exchange in regards to its offerings, notably following the insolvency of its one-time major competitor Mt. Gox.

On 28th February, it cut withdrawal fees via some of its third-party services in a move that increased the ease with which some customers would be able to move funds out of the exchange.
The moves also come in the wake of increasing attention from the mainstream media and warnings from major investors about the exchange’s practices.
Image credit: Sukharevskyy Dmytro (nevodka) / Shutterstock.com

source : http://www.coindesk.com/btc-e-to-allow-fund-withdrawals-to-select-visa-and-mastercard-cards/
Read more ...

ATM Industry Association Publishes Report on Bitcoin ATMs

ATM
The ATM Industry Association (ATMIA) has published a report titled “An Introduction to Bitcoin ATMs”, providing the industry’s first in-depth view of bitcoin and its implications for the ATM world.

The ATMIA commissioned the report, which was written by Tremont Capital Group, a leading consulting firm specializing in the ATM industry.
“We’ve been asked as an industry body to comment on the significance of bitcoin and digital currencies to the ATM and cash industries,” said Mike Lee, the association’s CEO.
“This paper is our first report of many which will enable us to draw some logical conclusions about how bitcoin will affect payments and regulations in future.”

Bitcoin overview

The report’s comprehensive analysis was conducted by ATM industry expert Sam M Ditzion and offers an overview of bitcoin’s history, how the currency works and significant landmark events and controversies. It goes on to cover the evolving regulatory landscape, and the expanding role of bitcoin ATMs.

The report further provides a summary of the current major players in the bitcoin ATM space, with a focus on the US and Canada, but also with reference to Singapore-based companies.
While several years have been devoted to building bitcoin’s basic infrastructure, the report says, the focus is now on consumer awareness and managing bitcoin’s reputation as a credible payment system.

Much of its growth is expected from younger generations, an increasingly powerful segment under-served by the ‘traditional’ finance industry, it adds.

Implications for the industry

According to the report, the growing popularity of bitcoin ATMs is due mainly to ease of access, compared to the often cumbersome procedures required by online exchanges and risks often associated with anonymous in-person trading.

It acknowledges that the bitcoin ATM industry is still in its infancy, and that many new companies will attempt to enter the space over the coming year.

Compliance with local regulations, wherever machines are located, presents a significant challenge to operators, both in bureaucracy and cost. There are also the technical challenges of ensuring machines have sturdy connections to ensure transactions are secure and reliable.

The report provides a rundown of regulations in various North American jurisdictions, including financially significant US states and Canada.

Overall the report’s tone is cautiously optimistic, although it stresses that the bitcoin ATM industry is still nascent and there are many issues that need to be resolved further to attract more deployers.

Growth industry

Bitcoin ATMs have become a booming industry in the past six months, with machines produced by at least six different companies operating live in many countries around the world at present, and several more to come online shortly.

They range in type from simple cash-to-bitcoin vending machines to full two-way exchange platforms – some offering security and compliance features, such as palm vein scans and ID recording.

About ATMIA and Tremont Capital Group

ATMIA is an independent, non-profit trade organization which promotes ATM use and convenience worldwide, while also protecting the ATM industry’s reputation and assets, and providing networking opportunities for its members. The association has chapters in all regions of the world.

Tremont Capital Group is the leading provider of business strategy consulting, research, and merger & acquisition advisory services to the ATM and related industries.
The proprietary research report is available free to all ATMIA members, or for purchase by non-members until April 30th at a discounted price of $145.00 USD (regular price $195.00).


source :   http://www.coindesk.com/atm-industry-association-publishes-report-bitcoin-atms/
Read more ...

Thursday, March 20, 2014

ATM Industry Association Publishes Report on Bitcoin ATMs

The ATM Industry Association (ATMIA) has published a report titled “An Introduction to Bitcoin ATMs”, providing the industry’s first in-depth view of bitcoin and its implications for the ATM world.

The ATMIA commissioned the report, which was written by Tremont Capital Group, a leading consulting firm specializing in the ATM industry.
“We’ve been asked as an industry body to comment on the significance of bitcoin and digital currencies to the ATM and cash industries,” said Mike Lee, the association’s CEO.
“This paper is our first report of many which will enable us to draw some logical conclusions about how bitcoin will affect payments and regulations in future.”

Bitcoin overview

The report’s comprehensive analysis was conducted by ATM industry expert Sam M Ditzion and offers an overview of bitcoin’s history, how the currency works and significant landmark events and controversies. It goes on to cover the evolving regulatory landscape, and the expanding role of bitcoin ATMs.
The report further provides a summary of the current major players in the bitcoin ATM space, with a focus on the US and Canada, but also with reference to Singapore-based companies.
While several years have been devoted to building bitcoin’s basic infrastructure, the report says, the focus is now on consumer awareness and managing bitcoin’s reputation as a credible payment system.

Much of its growth is expected from younger generations, an increasingly powerful segment under-served by the ‘traditional’ finance industry, it adds.

Implications for the industry

According to the report, the growing popularity of bitcoin ATMs is due mainly to ease of access, compared to the often cumbersome procedures required by online exchanges and risks often associated with anonymous in-person trading.
It acknowledges that the bitcoin ATM industry is still in its infancy, and that many new companies will attempt to enter the space over the coming year.

Compliance with local regulations, wherever machines are located, presents a significant challenge to operators, both in bureaucracy and cost. There are also the technical challenges of ensuring machines have sturdy connections to ensure transactions are secure and reliable.

The report provides a rundown of regulations in various North American jurisdictions, including financially significant US states and Canada.
Overall the report’s tone is cautiously optimistic, although it stresses that the bitcoin ATM industry is still nascent and there are many issues that need to be resolved further to attract more deployers.

Growth industry

Bitcoin ATMs have become a booming industry in the past six months, with machines produced by at least six different companies operating live in many countries around the world at present, and several more to come online shortly.

They range in type from simple cash-to-bitcoin vending machines to full two-way exchange platforms – some offering security and compliance features, such as palm vein scans and ID recording.

About ATMIA and Tremont Capital Group

ATMIA is an independent, non-profit trade organization which promotes ATM use and convenience worldwide, while also protecting the ATM industry’s reputation and assets, and providing networking opportunities for its members. The association has chapters in all regions of the world.

Tremont Capital Group is the leading provider of business strategy consulting, research, and merger & acquisition advisory services to the ATM and related industries.
The proprietary research report is available free to all ATMIA members, or for purchase by non-members until April 30th at a discounted price of $145.00 USD (regular price $195.00).

source : http://www.coindesk.com/atm-industry-association-publishes-report-bitcoin-atms/
Read more ...

SEC gets on the Bitcoin investigation bandwagon

A screen displays a news conference by Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen as traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange March 19, 2014. (Brendan McDermid/Reuters)
A screen displays a news conference by Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen as traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange March 19, 2014. (Brendan McDermid/Reuters)


Is Bitcoin a currency? People use it to buy things. Is it a security? Securities are traded on Bitcoin-denominated exchanges. Is it a commodity? “We are looking into that,” Mark Wetjen, acting chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission said earlier this month.
Fed chair Janet Yellen has said the Fed has no jurisdiction over Bitcoin but called on Congress to investigate. In January, Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said  the U.S. needed more time to assess the ”phenomenon” of Bitcoin to ensure it isn’t used for illegal purposes.

Created in 2009, Bitcoin is a popular virtual currency traded anonymously online without banks acting as middlemen. It isn’t tied to any country or controlled by a central bank, but it can be cashed in for dollars and other official currencies. It came to popular attention with the collapse Mt. Gox, the largest Bitcoin exchange, and several others in February, and Newsweek’s controversial “outing” of the currency’s anonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto — a claim called into question by the media frenzy that ensued.

Nobody is regulating Bitcoin. But everyone is investigating it. Most recently, it’s the Securities and Exchange Commission.

On March 3, they sent a letter to Mircea Popescu asking about the sale SatoshiDice, an online Bitcoin gambling business, on MPEx, the Bitcoin-based online exchange run by Popescu.
Specifically, the agency wanted the account statements of SatoshiDice founder Erik Vorhees, and any contracts or documents related to the listing or sale of shares in his company.
Popescu confirmed receipt of the letter to Bloomberg News and denied violation of any laws. A spokesman for the SEC would not confirm or deny the inquiry, Bloomberg said.

The Bitcoin entrepreneur sold his online gambling business last year for $11.5 million worth of bitcoins, in what was the first major Bitcoin acquisition, according to Venture Beat. It’s the sort of thing regulators like to keep an eye on, but the SEC hasn’t figured out whether they can even regulate Bitcoin exchanges.

That hasn’t stopped them from asking questions though.
Popescu was ready for them. He posted a copy of the SEC’s request on his website along with an email back-and-forth between himself and SEC lawyer Daphna Waxman.

Popescu responded mockingly, disputing at length the legality of the SEC’s request.
After giving her a verbal spanking, he did leave room for future cooperation:
“In the spirit of candor, let me make it perfectly clear that what’s being discussed here is nothing else and nothing short of the SEC’s ultimate relevancy and importance in the Bitcoin space, and so far I am not particularly impressed. Let us work together to improve upon this shaky basis if at all possible.”
But then he said he wanted a bunch of impossible (at least in the near term) stuff before the two could talk frankly, including an SEC determination that it lacks jurisdiction over Bitcoin.
Popescu dismissed the idea that the SEC has authority over MPEx and other Bitcoin exchanges on his website. Others in the bitcoin community are less cavalier about the potential for regulation. “….Negative pressure from the SEC could have a huge chilling effect,” the Bitcoin journal BitcoinX said.

Some are on board with regulation of the virtual currency, the highest profile among them being the Winklevoss twins (Tyler and Cameron), who have already registered their Bitcoin business with the SEC.

source : http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/03/20/sec-gets-on-the-bitcoin-investigation-bandwagon/?tid=hpModule_a2e19bf4-86a3-11e2-9d71-f0feafdd1394
Read more ...

Susan Tompor: What's the value of bitcoin? Heading for $10 or $10,000?



The crypto-currency craze has had a quick-riches feel of striking gold — or maybe even has the sound of getting in on the ground floor of the next Google or Apple stock.

Honestly, who doesn’t look twice when you hear that the value of the virtual currency bitcoin was just around $20 early last year but shot up to more than $1,000 in early December?
Yet is bitcoin heading for $10 or $10,000?

Bitcoin is a digital currency, created in 2009, that can be used to buy goods or services. Bitcoins exist only on the Internet but some bricks-and-mortar restaurants and retailers now accept them.
And bitcoins are traded on various online exchanges for other currencies.

Yet warnings are brewing that investors who make a bet on bitcoin and other virtual-currency-related investments could be taking a big gamble.

Consumer Reports Money Adviser’s April issue asked: “Is bitcoin the next bubble?”
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is cautioning investors that buying and using digital currency, such as bitcon, carries plenty of speculative risk.

“The threat of bitcoin-related fraud is a real danger for investors looking to make a quick profit from bitcoin,” according to FINRA.

While bitcoin trades like money, or another currency, it is not legal tender.
Instead, the bitcoin platform is touted as a new currency that’s free from government or central bank control.

The Internal Revenue Service has not been even clear yet on how to treat bitcoin. Is it a collectible? Currency? Or something else? The IRS continues to study virtual currencies and intends to provide some guidance on tax consequences.
Some news should give potential investors more reason to be cautious.

On Feb. 19, the Securities and Exchange Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of Imogo Mobile Technologies, which had announced testing of a new mobile platform for bitcoin a few weeks earlier.

On Feb. 24, the Tokyo-based Mt. Gox, one of the largest bitcoin exchanges, stopped its operations. It subsequently filed for bankruptcy in Japan on Feb. 27 and in the U.S. on March 10.

Gerri Walsh, FINRA’s senior vice president for investor education, said investors should understand that anytime there’s excitement about a new product or idea investors can easily be swept away, along with their cash, by all the emotion involved.

“Fraudsters may see the latest digital currency trend as a chance to steal their money through old-fashioned fraud,” Walsh said.

In the summer, the SEC charged a Texas man and his company with defrauding investors in a Ponzi scheme involving bitcoin.

FINRA’s Walsh said in an interview that regulators are concerned that investors could be hurt if they speculate on the price changes for bitcoin, too.

Regulators warned that platforms that buy and sell bitcoins can be hacked, and some have failed. In addition, unlike U.S. banks and credit unions that provide certain guarantees of safety to depositors, there are no such safeguards provided to bitcoins residing in digital wallets.
Some anticipate that more U.S. regulation is on the way for bitcoin, which could change the landscape and drive up costs.
Virtual pocketbooks, aside, no one really knows how bitcoin will play out. It is indeed a new game that bypasses the more sluggish, traditional banking system.
Goldman Sachs analysts took on the bitcoin bling and concluded the bitcoin is unlikely to work as a true currency. But some “ledger-based technology,” the report stated, could hold promise.
Where will bitcoin end up?

“I wish we all had a crystal ball and could know,” Walsh said. “But again, that is one of the risks.”
Contact Susan Tompor: 313-222-8876 or stompor@freepress.com

source : http://www.freep.com/article/20140320/COL07/303200025/bitcoin-FINRA-SEC-warnings-Susan-Tompor
Read more ...

Saturday, March 15, 2014

Analysis of, Malware from the MtGox leak archive

A few days ago the personal blog and Reddit account of MTgox CEO, Mark Karpeles, were hacked. Attackers used them to post a file, MtGox2014Leak.zip, which they claim contains valuable database dumps and specialized software for remote access to MtGox data. But this application is actually malware created to search and steal Bitcoin wallet files from their victims. It seems that the whole leak was invented to infect computers with Bitcoin-stealer malware that takes advantage of people keen interest in the MtGox topic.

The file is a zip archive (MD5 90e78be95914f93030b04eaceb22b447). It contains different kinds of data. The biggest item inside is trades.zip, which is 620MB: this is actually publicly available data on MtGox trades. Finally, the archive contains software binaries for Window PC and Mac.


MtGox leaked archive
We detect the Windows Trojan (MD5:c4e99fdcd40bee6eb6ce85167969348d), a 4.3MB PE32 executable, as Trojan.Win32.CoinStealer.i and OSX variant as Trojan.OSX.Coinstealer.a. Both have been created with the Livecode programming language – an open-source and cross-platform application development language. When the victim executes the application, it looks like the back-office software for accessing the databases of Mt. Gox’s owning company, Tibanne Co. Ltd..


Executed application
The malware part is quite simple. The Livecode application contains the source code as an encrypted and packed binary that’s available when executed. We dumped the Trojan code from memory and analyzed it.
The malware creates and executes the TibanneSocket.exe binary and searches for the files bitcoin.conf and wallet.dat – the latter is a critical data file for a Bitcoin crypto-currency user: if it is kept unencrypted and is stolen, cybercriminals will gain access to all Bitcoins the user has in his possession for that specific account.


Bitcoin wallet search source code with decoded strings
When the Trojan finds Bitcoin files it sends the content to a webserver


Communication code sample
The Command and Сontrol server, which used to be located in Bulgaria seems like has been shutdown is now offline.
Malware creators often using social engineering tricks and hot discussion topics to spread malware, and this is great example of an attack on a focused target audience.

source : https://www.securelist.com/en/blog/8196/Analysis_of_Malware_from_the_MtGox_leak_archive
Read more ...

MtGox Hacker tricks people to install Bitcoin Stealer

MTGox bitcoin malware hacking
This News will blow everyone’s mind! If you are a bitcoins holder then you might be aware of MtGox, Once the World's biggest Bitcoin exchangeMtGox filed for bankruptcy last month after saying it lost some 8,50,000 Bitcoins to hackers and suddenly went dark with no explanations.
A few days ago, some unknown hacker breached into the personal blog and Reddit account of MTgox CEO, Mark Karpeles to level charges of fraud. But, Hackers are very clever to avail every eventuality they get.
After compromising the MtGox CEO's blog, the hacker posted a 716MB ZIP file, MtGox2014Leak.zip, which contains the data dump and specialized software tools for remote access to MtGox data, but these software tools turned out to be a Bitcoin wallet stealing malware, according to the research carried out by the Kaspersky Lab Expert, Sergey Lozhkin.
 
The application was actually a malware, which was created to search and steal Bitcoin wallet files from the victims’ computer. The hackers took advantage of the people keen interest in the latest MtGox topic that abruptly stopped trading because of security lapse.

The Executable uploaded along with the archive tricks users into believing that they have access to databases of MtGox using the software, which is in fact a Bitcoin Miner.
MTGox bitcoin malware hacking
So, the whole MtGox leak was invented to infect the victims’ computers with Bitcoin stealer malware.
"We detect the Windows Trojan (MD5:c4e99fdcd40bee6eb6ce85167969348d), a 4.3MB PE32 executable, as Trojan.Win32.CoinStealer.i and OSX variant as Trojan.OSX.Coinstealer.a. Both have been created with the Livecode programming language – an open-source and cross-platform application development language." according to Kaspersky.
The malware works on both Mac OS X and Windows, executes the TibanneSocket.exe binary. It would seek out bitcoins (bitcoin.conf and wallet.dat files) on an infected computer and then send them to the Command and Control server of the malware, which was located in Bulgaria, but down for now.

Readers are advised to keep an eye on the spam emails, dressed up to look like MtGox emails and asking for MtGox and bank account details. Do not download softwares from non-trusted sources and keep your antivirus up-to-date. Stay Secure!
 
source : http://thehackernews.com/2014/03/mtgox-hacker-tricks-people-to-install.html
Read more ...

Australian Tax Office Explains Bitcoin, Intends to Tax it

shutterstock_123187171

The Australian Tax Office (ATO) has provided businesses with some more guidelines on how it intends to deal with bitcoin, stating that income and profits derived from bitcoin transactions are taxable.

The letter, sent to an Australian bitcoin entrepreneur in response to a request made last June, was a private ruling to specific questions and noted its contents were valid only to that case. But it gives digital currency businesses in the country a better idea of how they should act to comply with tax regulations.

The first question asked if transferring bitcoins to a private company in return for shares would count as income, either ordinary or that from a for-profit undertaking. The answer was simply “Yes”.
As to whether transferring bitcoins to another party would be subject to Goods and Services Tax (GST), the answer was also a one-word “Yes”.
Bitcoin profits would also be subject to capital gains tax, though deductions depending on the individual case would apply.

Clear understanding

The letter also laid out a series of explanations showing the ATO has a very clear understanding of what bitcoin is, as well as the technology and processes behind it.
It acknowledges that bitcoin is “based on an open source cryptographic protocol, which is not under the control of a central authority”.
According to the ATO’s definition:
“A Bitcoin is a numerical amount that is allocated to a ‘Bitcoin address’. A Bitcoin address is a long string of numbers and letters, each one unique. The process through which Bitcoins are created and enter into circulation is called Bitcoin mining.
Mining involves using freely downloadable Bitcoin software to solve complex cryptographic equations that essentially verify and validate blocks of Bitcoin transactions. The first ‘miner’ to successfully solving an equation receives a specified number of newly created Bitcoins as a reward to their Bitcoin address.
Accordingly, Bitcoins rely on a network of Bitcoin miners using the system to validate transactions and collectively implement a replicated ledger of Bitcoin transactions. The security of this ledger is protected by this mining process.
Bitcoins are circulated using a peer-to-peer computer network. Bitcoin users store their Bitcoins in a software program called a ‘Bitcoin wallet’.
A transaction involving Bitcoins requires an account, which is in essence a ‘public-/private-keypair’. A Bitcoin address derived from the public key is used to identify the account. To transfer Bitcoins to an account a transaction is created with the address of the account as the destination. To send Bitcoins from an account, the transaction has to be signed with the private key associated with the sending account.”
It also identified that participants in the bitcoin economy did so with the intention of making money, particularly those who mined:
“You invested a substantial amount of money in computer hardware and advanced scientific computing systems with the purpose of making substantial profit from mining and selling Bitcoins.”
An ATO representative had said in early February that the department would publish guidelines on bitcoin for the current tax year, which ends in June. Transactions would be taxed according to their value in Australian dollars.

Permissive atmosphere

Australia has provided some of the more level-headed responses to bitcoin and bitcoin business so far. Compared to other nations, warnings from Australia’s regulators have been comparatively mild and so far unofficial.

While the country’s corporate banks have reacted in different ways, there have been no central bank moves to block those banks or other financial institutions from working with digital currency. There are no longer any government-owned banks in Australia.
So far the response has been similar to that of Singapore, which has also provided some guidelines on how bitcoin businesses should approach tax time.
Melbourne image via Shutterstock

source : http://www.coindesk.com/australian-tax-office-explains-bitcoin-tax/
Read more ...

How Bitcoin is Changing Everything


Perhaps the single most prominent, and telling, feature of bitcoin today is its massive controversy in the media. Not a single day goes by without an article or televised mention about its dangers, risks, and dubious mainstream appeal.

Many in the mainstream seem set in their beliefs that bitcoin is a fad, or even worse a ponzi scheme, and is destined to fail. Yet when was the last time a ponzi scheme attracted global attention and prominent venture capital investment? Since when has a fad incited the simultaneous and largely hostile reactions of governments across the globe?

Why did other payment technologies like PayPal or Western Union apparently fail to meet the requirements to be discussed in virtually every central bank on the planet, yet cryptocurrency is being so thoroughly scrutinised? Ironically enough, the on-going debate about whether or not bitcoin is truly a valuable disruptive technology, is all the evidence you need that it is.
This is because bitcoin as a technology isn’t just challenging business models, or even an entire industry. Plenty of innovative outfits do that with much less flare. Bitcoin is challenging the financial infrastructure of the whole global economy, and even more, it is challenging entire generations of established political and economic theory that that infrastructure is built on.

Bitcoin’s exponential growth flouts all of the traditional monetary theory that is the mainstream ideology amongst academics and politicians today. Its very existence and growing success cannot be accounted for within these old paradigms.

It challenges not only the basis and underlying assumptions of the modern financial system, but calls into question the beliefs and even livelihood of so many politicians, economic advisors, and media pundits. That is why so many are so sceptical of it, and others even outright hostile.

Bitcoin the currency

As a currency, bitcoin is in many ways the antithesis of modern fiat currencies. It has grown exponentially in usage the last year, and all without being declared by any state or central bank as “legal tender”. That simple fact astonishes many in academia, who could never have guessed a currency could spontaneously form and organically grow within the modern free market.

It was something that was never even discussed theoretically, and is still taking time to sink in amidst the denials that bitcoin is here to stay.

Yet this occurrence is surprisingly not entirely without precedence. Bitcoin is not the only example of a homogenous “good” being adopted by a population as a currency, for nothing but its underlying natural value and universal appeal. We have a much older example of that: gold, more than 5,000 years ago.

Cryptocurrency is following the same path as precious metals in ancient civilization. Where gold was valued for its color, easy malleability, purity and its anti-corrosive properties, bitcoin is valued for it’s speed, decentralization, anonymity and ultra low transaction costs.
gold
Gold was discovered by practically every world civilization and became a good of such universal value it slowly became the de facto means of exchange (along with silver) across much of the planet, eventually culminating in the Classical Gold Standard. That is a span of dominance of thousands of years, compared with the 43 years of the global fiat system we have today.
History thus clearly shows that the idea of a currency deriving value primarily from the “backing” of some central state is nonsense.

For the vast majority of civilization, money was gold or silver, and both originated not as centrally issued currency that, as a result, magically had value, but as universally valued substances.

Bitcoin is fast becoming the first commodity since gold to become a widely accepted means of exchange without the need of a central authority backing it.

However unlike gold, Bitcoin is completely out of the reach of governments and can’t be regulated, centralized, or ultimately shut down and replaced with inflationary fiat money. For all its durability and timeless lustre, gold my pale to the longevity of a cryptocurrency system.

Reacting to Big Data

However Bitcoin is not just a currency that promises to eventually end the trend of patchwork national currencies that exist for the almost sole purpose of allowing governments to endlessly fund their own deficit spending.

When the Internet was growing in the 90s it promised a future in which everyone everywhere had access to all the knowledge in the world, a future where technology ultimately empowered the individual.

Indeed, this promise is coming closer and closer everyday as more people in underdeveloped countries have access to cheaper and cheaper smartphones and Internet access. However behind this positive outward development, the big players have long since been behind a much different trend.
Businesses will hopefully creatively utilize the open source design of Bitcoin to provide entirely secure and anonymous end-to-end experiences.
Google, Facebook, as well as many others, all keep meticulous track of user data for advertising and other purposes. On several occasions, the massive amounts of data collected by Internet service and telecommunications companies have been utilized by agencies such as the NSA, under morally questionable motives at best.

The result is a system that has evolved with the ability to track everything you do, like, go, and know, and then provide all of that data to one central authority you may or may not trust, all with little choice for the consumer. The Internet has recently been more reminiscent of Orwell’s 1984, rather than the future of individual empowerment that was promised.

Cryptocurrency is the first major technological advancement that, intentionally or not, is a massive reaction to the trend of Big Data. It is decentralized and anonymous by design, and it is these key features within the Bitcoin protocol itself that may be the key to weakening the hold of massive data collecting service companies like Google.

Already, all payments with Bitcoin are anonymous, which could allow users to opt out of advertising with anonymous micropayments. Yet many other cryptocurrencies such as Namecoin are attempting to take the protocol that enables this and use it to build other decentralized networks.
Among these can be email, domain names, and other such systems.

Decentralized applications

This is only the beginning however, businesses will hopefully creatively utilize the open source design of Bitcoin to provide entirely secure and anonymous end-to-end experiences. The possibilities for the emerging wave of decentralized applications are endless, and only time will tell what it does result in. As David Johnson, the $1m sponsor of the Austin Bitcoin Hackathon put it:
“[Decentralized applications] have the potential to become self-sustaining because they empower their stakeholders to invest in the development of the DA.
Because of that, it is conceivable that DAs for payments, social networking, and cloud computing may one day surpass the valuation of multinational corporations like Western Union, Visa, Facebook, Google, and Amazon that are are currently active in the space.”

At the very least, the ever-growing success of bitcoin thus far candidly illustrates that there is indeed a massive demand for anonymity online, one companies would be wise to take advantage of.
It’s far too tempting to compare bitcoin to PCs, the Internet, or even to gold 5,000 years ago. While it does possess similarities with many of these things, and comparing it to such landmark achievements underscores its importance, bitcoin is it’s own phenomena.

PCs may have had a huge amount of industry leaders shrugging it off or denouncing it entirely like bitcoin does now, but it never had whole governments attempting to shut down or regulate its use.
Precious metals may have been the first and last good to become universally adopted as a means of exchange, but this was a slow process that took centuries if not millennia, whereas the usage of cryptocurrencies has exploded in just a few short years.

While bitcoin may have many old conceptual roots, it is altogether new and powerful. It is ushering in a new paradigm in various aspects of society, and creating a new benchmark for future technological achievements to inevitably be compared to.
Bitcoin is changing everything, and if you aren’t on board, then you’re already a dinosaur.

source : http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-changing-everything/
Read more ...

TigerDirect Tops $1 Million in Total Bitcoin Sales

Screen Shot 2014-03-14 at 8.35.41 PM

Florida-based online high-tech retailer TigerDirect passed $1m in total bitcoin sales on 13th March, less than two months after it began accepting the digital currency.

TigerDirect began taking bitcoin on 23rd January, partnering with Georgia-based merchant processor BitPay, and has been active at incentivizing its budding bitcoin customer base.
Steven Leeds, director of marketing at Tiger Direct, told CoinDesk that his company has been very pleased with its decision so far.
Said Leeds:
“The overwhelming response from our customers validates our decision.”
In addition to the sales increase, Leeds indicates that customers have benefitted from the arrangement as well, saving money on transaction fees when compared to other forms of online payment such as credit cards.
TigerDirect joins Overstock as the second merchant to pass the $1m bitcoin sales mark. Overstock announced that it reached the milestone on 4th March.

Winning combination

So far, TigerDirect’s results indicate that bitcoin has resonated with its predominantly high-tech customer base. TigerDirect took roughly 50 days to pass the $1m mark, based on its own projections.
Notably, TigerDirect saw a 50% spike on sales of some items in the aftermath of the announcement. The top-selling items on the site were video cards, power units, tablets, Xbox units and other high-tech items.

Overstock did not provide hard figures as to when it passed $1m in total, citing legal reasons, but did suggest that this mark was passed in mid-February. The Utah-based e-commerce giant later confirmed this figure on 4th March.
The similar timelines indicate that TigerDirect may not have had a sales advantage, though its audience and bitcoin’s were more likely to overlap.

Merchant impact

TigerDirect’s success is likely to play a key role in convincing more merchants to accept bitcoin payments, given that it has now proven to be a large and consistent revenue stream for two major merchants.

Earlier this week, US retailer Lord & Taylor’s parent company Hudson Bay Co. revealed Overstock played a key role in convincing it that it was time to test the waters with bitcoin.
The news comes as bitcoin merchant processors such as BitPay and Coinbase continue to add merchants at an increasing rate. BitPay has indicated it is now adding more than 1,000 merchants per week.
Disclaimer: CoinDesk founder Shakil Khan is an investor in BitPay.

source : http://www.coindesk.com/tigerdirect-tops-1-million-total-bitcoin-sales/
Read more ...

Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox target of proposed Canadian class action suit

Mt. Gox has filed for bankruptcy in Japan and the U.S.

TORONTO — A proposed class action will seek $500 million in compensation for Canadians with deposits in what was once the largest bitcoin digital-currency exchange in the world, according to a court notice filed Friday.

The lawsuit targets Mt. Gox and its two owners, Mark Karpeles and Jed McCaleb, as well as one of the largest banks in Japan, according to the notice of action to Ontario Superior Court.
Among other things, the action alleges negligence, breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation — none of which has been proven in any court.

Toronto litigation lawyer Ted Charney said Mt. Gox held an estimated US$465 million in trust for its clients and millions of dollars belonged to Canadian users.
The company has offered no accounting for how much non-bitcoin currency it held or what happened to money that was supposed to have been kept in trust, he said.

“We’re never going to find out what’s going on unless we start a lawsuit because it’s the only way
 we’re going to get access to the records,” Charney said in an interview.
“It’s really the only way to get the thing going.”

The Mt. Gox bitcoin exchange halted all withdrawals early last month, then abruptly shut down. Earlier this week, it filed for bankruptcy protection in the United States.

The online exchange had already filed for bankruptcy in Japan, saying it may have lost bitcoins belonging to 750,000 of its customers.

Karpeles has said computer hackers took advantage of the exchange’s flawed software, a security breach critics said may have persisted for years.

“After this news broke, the price of bitcoins plummeted, creating a disruptive ripple effect that has nearly shut down the industry,” said Friday’s notice of action.

The notice, which provides a summary of the case, gives lawyers a month to file a substantive statement of claim.

Proposed as class representatives are David Joyce, of Toronto, Sancho McCann, of Vancouver, Alexandre Pepin, of Montreal, and Paul Collin, of Calgary. Each claims to be owed various amounts, either in bitcoins or, in Joyce’s case, as much as $24,500 in cash.

The Canadian action also names Mizuho Bank on the grounds that the Japanese financial institution held an account with non-bitcoin currency that was transferred from the personal bank accounts of users to the Mt. Gox exchange.

Charney said his firm is working together with the U.S. lawyers who are pressing a class action south of the border.

According to the Canadian suit, Mt. Gox had contracted to hold all money and digital currency deposits in user accounts.

The national class action seeks to represent Canadians who paid Mt. Gox a fee to trade bitcoins or who had the digital or other currency stored on the exchange when it went offline.
In Dallas on Monday, Mt. Gox lawyers said it needed bankruptcy protection to avoid irreparable damage from a proposed class action filed in Chicago federal court and a suit alleging breach of contract in Seattle.

U.S. lawyers complain the case involves “massive fraud.”

Read more ...

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Perseus Telecom Launches Digital Currency Initiative, Integrated Exchange

connection
Perseus Telecom has launched a new initiative with the aim to provide industrial-strength security for bitcoin exchanges, e-commerce, online gaming and multimedia sites.
Perseus started accepting bitcoin payments just last month. The company is a provider of high-speed communications used by hedge funds, trading firms and media organisations in major financial hubs from London to Tokyo.

The company’s Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) is being introduced just weeks after the Mt. Gox failure and Perseus seems to think that no crisis should ever go to waste. In fact, it is hoping to capitalise on bitcoin security concerns.

In addition to the initiative, Perseus and Atlas ATS also announced the launch of a globally integrated bitcoin exchange.

Mt. Gox is a learning opportunity

Perseus Telecom EMEA head of business development Carl Weir described the Mt. Gox collapse as a “learning opportunity.”
“The goal of DCI is to make sure that there is financial institution level security, KYC, and trading available and secure in multiple regions, hence Perseus’ role in this.”
Perseus points out that other bitcoin exchanges view the Mt. Gox failure as the result of a new industry undergoing a shakeout. Failures are not uncommon in immature, unregulated markets or technologies, it adds.

Perseus has teamed up with Atlas ATS and Strevus Inc. The latter hopes create one or two US-based currency exchanges. Appropriately, New York State announced that it would start accepting applications for digital currency exchanges earlier this week.

Security should be a top priority

The Mt. Gox collapse is viewed by many as the end of an era. As the bitcoin ecosystem matures, it is likely that regulation and security will play a bigger role, and this is exactly where Perseus sees a market opportunity.

“With DCI, we’re ensuring that anti-money laundering and know your customer rules are in place, and can be reported to regulators should they require it. In addition, bitcoins should be placed in cold storage, so that users whether financial institutions or individuals, don’t lose their bitcoin,” said Weir.
“If someone hacks the exchange site, there’s a layer within the trading environment which automatically rejects inconsistent code, which means it doesn’t get to the trading system.”
Atlas ATS is contributing multi-tiered software that allows it to control access and limit exposure on all levels. Even if an attacker penetrates the web tier, that won’t be enough to interfere with the core matching engine, which is disconnected from servers that actually store bitcoins. Most bitcoin holdings will be kept in cold storage.

First exchange officially launched

Perseus and Atlas ATS aren’t wasting time. The companies have announced the launch of a globally integrated bitcoin exchange in New  York, Hong Kong and Singapore. Their goal is to facilitate bitcoin trading by large financial institutions. Perseus CEO Jock Percy said:
“Now, institutional investors and banks can see that there are known players with the right pedigree engaged in bitcoin.”
The Wall Street Journal points out that Perseus’ high-bandwidth lines are used to connect securities exchanges to execution platforms around the world. Percy highlights that the company’s clients have expressed demand for such services, but they were concerned about regulatory compliance and risk.
Percy also took a swipe at existing bitcoin exchanges, saying most of them reside on cloud-based servers that are inherently glitchy, while the Atlas ATS platform will be located in a robust, dedicated network.

Soft launch

The Atlas ATS platform has already been soft-launched and it handles about 10,000 transactions a day. Atlas ATS CEO Shawn Sloves said integration across multiple locations will improve liquidity by creating a global order book that circumvents the existing bitcoin trading environment.
He described the current environment as regionally focused and fragmented and said it was not “Wall Street grade.”

Sloves expects daily trading to hit 100,000 transactions by the end of the year and he is basing his prediction on demand expressed by institutional clients, not bitcoin enthusiasts. This, he argues, is what will set the platform apart from existing exchanges.
The big fish are coming and the Mt. Gox collapse is just blood in the water.

source : http://www.coindesk.com/perseus-telecom-launches-digital-currency-initiative-integrated-exchange/
Read more ...

Chicago Court Freezes Assets of Mark Karpeles in the US


Mark Karpeles
 
 A Chicago judge has reportedly frozen all US-based assets controlled by Mark Karpeles, the CEO of the now defunct bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox.

US District Judge Gary Feinerman made the decision to freeze Karpeles’ assets, along with assets belonging to companies tied to both Mt. Gox and Karpeles, according to the Wall Street Journal. The order is temporary, but the assets will remain frozen for at least two weeks.

This move doesn’t appear to be directly related to the exchange’s Chapter 15 bankruptcy proceedings. It is, in fact, the result of a prior lawsuit filed against Karpeles by Mt. Gox customers seeking compensation. It is not yet a class action, but it might soon become one.

As reported yesterday, Chapter 15 bankruptcy will not stop the case from moving forward and the asset freeze proves it is going ahead.

Will the asset freeze help customers?

Courts impose asset freezes in situations like this to secure plaintiffs and make sure the defendants don’t funnel money elsewhere. However, in this particular case it probably won’t go a long way toward reassuring customers, as Karpeles’ holdings in the US appear to be limited.

In court, lawyers for exchange customers alleged that Karpeles is moving funds which are claimed lost by Mt. Gox. One of the attorneys involved in the case, Jay Edelson, argued that every day the customers wait there will be “less and less money”. Christopher Dore, another Edelson attorney, said:
“The main thing we hope to achieve is to finally see what the web of things that Karpeles has put together over the last few years and to start unwinding it as to where things are and what happened.”
The asset freeze targets bank accounts used by Mt. Gox and Karpeles, as well as servers located in the US. However, even the judge admitted there might be no assets to freeze. “It may turn out there are no such assets,” Feinerman said.

More questions than answers

Judge Feinerman has scheduled a status conference for 20th March. Lead plantiff’s lawyer Jay Edelson said he is looking to question Karpeles under oath immediately, Bloomberg reports.

“We can finally get some real answers,” Edelson said.

Attorney Steven Woodrow believes the court order could freeze between $2.1m and $5m in assets controlled by Karpeles. In its Chapter 15 filing Mt. Gox claimed to have approximately $63.9m in liabilities and $37.7m in assets

source : http://www.coindesk.com/chicago-court-freezes-mark-karpeles-assets-us/
Read more ...

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Travel Keys Lets You Pay For 5000+ Luxury Villas With Bitcoin

4537_2

Travel Keys, a travel broker that operates a network of more than 5,000 luxury villas in the Caribbean, Europe and around the world, is now accepting bitcoin as a payment method.
Travel Keys announced the decision on 7th March, becoming the latest luxury villa business to accept digital currency.
Bobby Gibson, the company’s CEO, spoke to CoinDesk about the decision, noting that as an avid follower of “anything and everything ‘tech’”, he’s been monitoring bitcoin for a few years.
From there, all it took was demand from guests. Said Gibson:
“Nothing gives our team more satisfaction than telling our guests ‘Yes!’. When the request from one of our international clients was received to pay for their villa in bitcoins, we were more than happy to oblige.”
villa
Founded in 1991, Travel Keys indicates that its travel professionals and partners handpick and personally inspect each luxury villa on its network. Booking prices range from a few hundred dollars to upwards of $5,000 a night.

Once there, guests are provided concierge services, local hosts and a team of support advisors that have earned Travel Keys respectable marks from travel review services like TripAdvisor.

Selecting a service

Gibson said that Travel Keys has opted to ink its merchant processing deal with San Francisco-based Coinbase. Using this service, Gibson’s funds are converted into whatever currency his international homeowners require.
The result, Gibson suggests, is savings along the payment chain. Guests get fast, low-cost transactions, while any operational savings reaped by Travel Keys is reinvested in the customer experience.
5574_313_image003
Despite these benefits, though, Gibson said widespread bitcoin adoption in the travel industry isn’t yet likely. As an example, he named the most recent insolvency of Japan-based exchange Mt. Gox as an event that could push business away in the short term.

However, he was still optimistic about the future:
“I envision the bitcoin community rallying together to address these incidents, perhaps putting preventative exchange regulations in place, and BTC becoming a mainstream currency that travel companies would be well advised to embrace.”

More currencies possible

Though Gibson is just started accepting bitcoin, he indicated that he’s open to taking other digital currencies as well.
“If a client requests it, and it’s a proven reliable form of transmitting funds at minimal cost to the guest and/or the homeowner then I don’t see why not,” Gibson said.
7249_11
As for the success of the program, Gibson was unwilling to provide details on his bitcoin buyers and their transactions.
Part of the value in booking with Travel Keys, he said, is the confidentiality you enjoy.
Images provided by Travel Keys
 source :  http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-5000-luxury-villas-100-vacation-destinations/
Read more ...