© Flickr.com/antanacoins/cc-by-sa 3.0
Antony Lewis, Business Development at itBit, Bitcoin Exchange in Singapore talked to VoR answering questions on what gold and Bitcoin have in common as well as why Bitcoin exchanges bring bad reputation.
How will the troubles affecting the biggest Bitcoin exchanges influence the reputation of Bitcoin as a safe digital currency?
Yes,
we can see from the price action that people are certainly worried
about the troubles at some exchanges. But I would say Bitcoin itself is
inherently a safe currency in principle. It is the implementations and
accounting processes that differ across the exchanges. So for example,
our exchange itBit, based in Singapore, has not been impacted by the
malleability issues. In fact we picked up customers coming from other
exchanges. So speaking with the long-term investors, they understand
that we are in a very early stage of the industry. You have to pick your
partners very carefully at this point in time. We are looking to
differentiate, and we look forward to global regulations that will drive
responsible practices by exchanges and other Bitcoin companies, that
will help to protect our clients.
Is Bitcoin the gold of the digital age?
Some
people would consider Bitcoin to be a digital form of gold and there
are some similarities. For example, with gold there is only a finite
amount that you can dig up. And it is similar with Bitcoin, where only
21 million Bitcoin will be mined around the year 2140. Where Bitcoin and
gold differs is that it is very hard to pay for things in gold. You
can’t just hand over a piece of gold to shopkeeper and cut in half and
give a small piece to them to buy a chocolate bar. But with Bitcoin you
can split it, you can have down to eight zeroes after the dot, you can
really, really split it into tiny amount. It doesn’t weigh anything to
carry. And other similarity between gold and Bitcoin is that while it is
quite easy to counterfeit a banknote, with Bitcoin and gold it is very,
very difficult to duplicate. With Bitcoin, the system won’t let you
spend the same Bitcoin twice with two different people and I think
that’s one of the fundamental properties of Bitcoin; this is why it is
revolutionary because we solved a problem of taking digital assets and
we stopped people from being able to copy it and spend it twice. I think
the important point is that Bitcoin doesn’t need essential trusted
person or entity with which to prove that the transactions happened. So
if you take dollars or normal currencies there would be a bank who you
have to trust and you have to believe what the bank says when it says
that you have the money to spend the money or you are not allowed to
spend the money. And with Bitcoin you don’t need that middleman.
No comments:
Post a Comment